| |
This is a letter to Dr. Elizabeth Whelan
in regards to a recent article/booklet featured on the
American Council of Science and Health website.
Dr. Elizabeth Whelan
President
American Council on Science and Health
1995 Broadway, Second Floor
New York, NY 10023-5860
FAX: (212) 362-4919
whelan@acsh.org (Elizabeth Whelan Sc.D., M.P.H., President)
byck@acsh.org (Deanna Byck Sc.D., M.P.H, Director of Public
Health Policy)
kava@acsh.org (Ruth Kava, Ph.D., R.D., Director of Nutrition)
Dear Dr. Whelan:
As a breastfeeding mother, I was disappointed in the description
of your new booklet, "Growing Healthy Kids," that
I read on your website. I was especially taken aback by the
comments that, "While human breast milk is the 'gold
standard' for infant feeding, modern infant formulas are
designed to copy closely the composition of breast milk."
Because of this, I believe that your booklet gives the false
impression that breastfeeding and formula use are interchangeable.
In fact, breastmilk is better and safer for a baby than formula
in nearly all circumstances. Despite your claim that formula
mirrors "closely the composition of breastmilk,"
research shows that formula lacks components of breastmilk
uniquely designed for the human infant because they cannot
be synthetically reproduced. In particular, we cannot discount
the immunological benefits of breastfeeding. Studies show
that women who were themselves breastfed are at decreased
risk of breast and ovarian cancer. By discouraging breastfeeding,
we may in fact put our children at greater risk to environmental
toxins.
Since your organization is committed to "separat[ing]
the leading causes of disease and death from the leading
causes of unnecessary anxiety," you would be wise to
further review current scientific data associated with the
benefits of breastfeeding before equating it with formula.
Formula feeding is associated with a higher incidence of
allergies, cognitive deficiencies, cardiorespiratory disturbances,
morbidity, and mortality. Formula fed infants have 10 times
the risk of hospitalization due to bacterial infection, double
the risk of lower respiratory tract infections, 3-4 times
the risk of otitis media, 3-4 times the risk of diarrheal
illness (in industrialized nations), and 5-8 times the risk
of childhood lymphomas. Formula feeding accelerates the development
of celiac disease and is a risk factor for Crohn's disease
and adult ulcerative colitis. Formulas have been found to
contain potentially toxic levels of vitamin D, aluminum,
high levels of iodine, and bacterial contaminants including
Enterobacter sakazakii. For the citations for these facts,
as well as other risks associated with the use of formula,
please refer to the American Academy of Pediatrics statement,
"Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk."
I heartily concur that "both individual health decisions
and public policies [should be] based on sound scientific
evidence." The scientific evidence in this instance
is clear: breastfeeding is far and away the best way to nourish
babies. Clearly, breastfeeding must be supported and encouraged
if we are committed to raising healthy children. I strongly
urge you to correct any misconceptions about the relative
risks and benefits of breastfeeding caused by your booklet
by further reviewing the hazards associated with formula
use.

|
|